This seems to be numerical imprecision. You can see that iR
is constant:
THEORETICAL MOMENTS
VARIABLE MEAN STD. DEV. VARIANCE
iR 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
A general remark: your estimation results are wrong as you are not handling parameter dependence correctly. You can see that if you change
biglamda = 1.02; // balanced growth rate (new)
Then your steady state file will not work. See e.g.