It seems we can not have export and trade balance variables in same DSGE model

Sorry for such a long question…but I am confused about this.

Let’s say we have the following budget constraint for the household (where B_t is foreign bond, \Pi_t is firm profit):
P_t C_t + B_t = W_tN_t + R_{t-1} B_{t-1} + P_t\Pi_t

Using the firm’s profit function,
P_t\Pi_t = P_tY_t - W_tN_t

We can derive resource constraint,
C_t + \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} = Y_t

  1. In GC Lim, PD McNelis - 2008, there is a definition for export (X_t = f(\cdot)) in their models, so the authors define the following evolution of foreign debt \frac{B_t}{P_t} = \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + X_t so that goods market clearing condition is Y_t = C_t + X_t.

  2. In J Galí - 2015, they do a similar thing in chapter 8, where export (X_t = f(\cdot)) is defined, and goods market-clearing condition is Y_t = C_t + X_t (Assuming households does not consume foreign goods). However, there is no mention of foreign debt evolution ( \frac{B_t}{P_t} = \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + X_t). They just state that goods market clearing condition requires that Y_t = C_t + X_t. I guess this requirement would mean that \frac{B_t}{P_t} = \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + X_t (in incomplete market case), which can be derived by matching resource constraint (C_t + \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} = Y_t) to the goods market clearing condition (Y_t = C_t + X_t)

  3. In Valerio Nispi Landi notes, there is no export, so he defines trade balance as TB_t = \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t}. And goods market clearing condition is Y_t = C_t + TB_t.

So it seems to me one cannot have both export and trade balance variables in the model, right? For example, if you have export defined in the model, resource constraint suggests that \frac{B_t}{P_t} = \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + X_t. So you cannot also define TB_t = \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t}, which would just results in TB_t = X_t. I understand this makes sense since TB_t = X_t - M_t, and M_t = 0 here in the model.

But even when imports are not zero,

  1. Foreign debt evolution equation is defined as \frac{B_t}{P_t} = \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} - M_t + X_t in GC Lim, PD McNelis - 2008, so that domestic goods market clearing is Y^h_t = C^h_t + X_t
  2. Following Valerio Nispi Landi notes, trade balance would be TB_t = \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + M_t, so that domestic goods market clearing is Y^h_t = C^h_t + TB_t.

To me, it seems TB_t = X_t. However, if you put export demand (X_t = f(\cdot)) in your model, and you define foreign debt evolution \frac{B_t}{P_t} = \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} - M_t + X_t, so that goods market clearing condition is Y^h_t = C^h_t + X_t (as in GC Lim, PD McNelis - 2008 and Gali - 2015), you cannot also define TB_t = \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + M_t in same model, right? Because it would just mean TB_t = X_t. Or maybe I am missing something here…

Or if we have export in the model, then we need to change the definition of trade balance from say TB_t = \frac{B_t}{P_t} - \frac{R_{t-1} B_{t-1}}{P_t} + M_t to TB_t = X_t - M_t. Thus, definition of trade balance is discretional and we can choose how we define it…

Thanks for any reply…

1 Like

I am not sure I understand the confusing. The national income accounting identity clearly states that
Y=C+I+G+NX
where NX are net exports X-IM (the trade balance). Only in the special case of imports being 0 will you have simply exports appearing (or if there is a redefinition of X measuring net exports)