CES consumption function with durables – treatment of relative demand and prices

Hi everyone,

I have a more general question about working with CES consumption functions in New Keynesian models.

Suppose you have a CES consumption function of the kind underneath, where both goods are flow goods.

image

In my understanding, one would then set up the Lagrangian and solve the intertemporal optimization problem with respect to image, while also solving an intratemporal allocation problem to obtain the relative demand schedules for imageand image, as well as the price index of the CES bundle (as shown underneath).

This has always worked out fine for me.

However, I get confused when durables enter the consumption aggregate.
Say the consumption function now takes the following form, where image are nondurable goods (flow goods), and imageare services from durables, with image denoting utilization.

image

It’s not entirely clear to me how this problem changes.

Some specific questions:

  1. What is the price of image? I suppose it is not equal to the price of investing in durable goods, say image. Rather, it might be image? Or should the relevant price be derived using the multiplier on the accumulation constraint for durables?

  2. Should we still derive the intratemporal allocation problem to obtain relative demand schedules, or is it sufficient to simply solve the Lagrangian directly?
    In my current setup, I defined variables image and image as the derivatives of utility with respect to image and image, respectively.
    I then solved the Lagrangian and substituted in these expressions where needed.
    Consequently, I do not have explicit relative demand schedules for imageand image, nor a derived price index of the CES consumption bundle.
    I simply define inflation as a weighted average of consumption and durable good inflation.

As a sidenote, the model with durables runs fine and behaves reasonably.
However, to provide some context for my doubt: I have a small open economy, two-sector NK model (where both durables and consumption goods are domestically produced).
When I introduce a negative discretionary income effect after an energy price shock, GDP actually increases, even though domestic consumption falls.
This happens because exports rise disproportionately.
I suspect this might be related to how I treat prices and inflation—if relative prices move too much, exports may react excessively (though other mechanisms could contribute as well).

It doesn’t feel right to continue with this specification until I fully understand whether this CES setup and treatment of prices are conceptually sound.

Any thoughts or references would be very much appreciated!

Best regards,
Alec