Asymmetric responses in a perfect foresight model

Did you mean to say, “If you don’t make sure the \bar{ \pi} moves with the change in the inflation rate…”? Because \bar{ \pi} is already the target, yeah? And thus, your reply sounds like, “if you don’t make sure the target moves with a change in the target…”

So what I have in my model is something like this. Everything is the same in the initial and endval sections, except target and steady-state inflation rate (inflation_rate). The model is non-linear.

var Y C ...;

varexo target;

parameters alpha beta ...;

model;

initval;
target = exp(0.08/4);
inflation_rate = exp(0.08/4);
Y  = some expression;
C = some expression;
 
endval;
target = exp(0.04/4);
inflation_rate = exp(0.04/4);
Y  = some expression;
C = some expression;

Y,C here are real variables. I will investigate why the discrepancy occurs in my model. But can you confirm this statement (to make sure I understand correctly)…

Even in a non-linear model, a non-zero inflation rate has no effect on real variables in steady-state unless there is some sort of incomplete indexation in the model.