Additional components appearing in monetary policy rule

I don’t really know where the question is going. Let’s try to structure things a bit.

  1. In pure model building terms, you can put everything you want into a feedback rule. The only limit is your imagination.
  2. When it comes to the describing actual policies/central bank behavior, things will be different, because central banks may care about very specific things (which will typically differ across countries and time)
  3. Things are again different when doing a normative analysis, i.e. whether feedback rules should respond to particular variables. Here, the answer is not a priori clear.

Regarding your last question: every shock you put into the monetary policy rule will be isomorphic to a monetary policy shock. But you may give it a different interpretation, e.g. anticipated shocks may be forward guidance shocks. What is usually not feasible is having the shocks represent endogenous variables as they are exogenous objects.