# The convergence speed of translation is not fast enough

**URL:** https://forum.dynare.org/t/the-convergence-speed-of-translation-is-not-fast-enough/27632
**Category:** Stochastic simulations
**Created:** [21 May 2025 13:49 UTC](https://forum.dynare.org/t/the-convergence-speed-of-translation-is-not-fast-enough/27632 "2025-05-21T13:49:48Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jpfeifer](https://forum.dynare.org/user_avatar/forum.dynare.org/jpfeifer/32/5044_2.png) [@jpfeifer](https://forum.dynare.org/u/jpfeifer)
#### Post date: [22 May 2025 06:40 UTC](https://forum.dynare.org/t/the-convergence-speed-of-translation-is-not-fast-enough/27632/2 "2025-05-22T06:40:12Z")

</div>

Have a look at the various threads related to the problem. E.g.

> [@Longlasting IRFs](https://forum.dynare.org/t/longlasting-irfs/13781/2):
>
> That is hard to tell. Most of the times, we actually want out model to feature persistence, i.e. endogenous propagation. In a quarterly model, 50 periods is a bit more then 10 years. That can still be considered a business cycle frequency.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.dynare.org/t/the-convergence-speed-of-translation-is-not-fast-enough/27632)._