Rotemberg vs. Calvo

Rotemberg and Calvo are equivalent under first-order approximation (if the slope is equally calibrated) but does this also hold for the perfect foresight solution?
I have a model where this is true for the stochastic simulation and not for the perfect foresight, so I get different responses between Calvo and Rotemberg for my perfect foresight solution. But the irfs are identical for stochastic simulation order 1.

I am wondering if this right?

Yes, as you wrote above, the equivalence result holds at first order. At higher order they differ. That is, e.g., particularly relevant at the zero lower bound.

1 Like