Rotemberg and Calvo are equivalent under first-order approximation (if the slope is equally calibrated) but does this also hold for the perfect foresight solution?
I have a model where this is true for the stochastic simulation and not for the perfect foresight, so I get different responses between Calvo and Rotemberg for my perfect foresight solution. But the irfs are identical for stochastic simulation order 1.
I am wondering if this right?