Question on Basu Bundick (2017)

Hi Johannes,

I am trying to learn the Basu Bundick model. I have checked their Dynare code and their preference volatility shock generates non-zero impulse responses in the level of preference (a_{t}). From my understanding, this should not be possible as their specification of the shock process does not have a Jensen’s inequality effect. Is it possible that this is due to the impulse response being calculated using 3rd order approximation simulation?

Best,
Tian

That sounds strange. Can you provide files to replicate the issue?

Hi Johannes,

This is the example I used to learn the model. The stochastic simulation shows that the volatility shock generates non-zero responses of variable a.

Best regards,
Tian

Basu_Bundick_2017.mod (13.2 KB)
Basu_Bundick_2017_editM_steadystate.m (4.1 KB)

You are using simulation-based ergodic GIRFs. You will need a really large replic in the order of several ten thousands for a to stay flat. That’s why most papers use GIRFs at the stochastic steady state.