# Lagged Expectations

**URL:** <https://forum.dynare.org/t/lagged-expectations/19048>\
**Category:** Replication Attempts\
**Created:** [7 October 2021 22:59 UTC](https://forum.dynare.org/t/lagged-expectations/19048 "2021-10-07T22:59:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jpfeifer](https://forum.dynare.org/user_avatar/forum.dynare.org/jpfeifer/32/5044_2.png) [@jpfeifer](https://forum.dynare.org/u/jpfeifer)\
**Post date:** [8 October 2021 06:51 UTC](https://forum.dynare.org/t/lagged-expectations/19048/2 "2021-10-08T06:51:00Z")

</div>

See

> [@End of period convention and decision lag](https://forum.dynare.org/t/end-of-period-convention-and-decision-lag/6014/2):
>
> Actually, from what you describe, I think the law of motion for n should be n\_t =(1-rho\_{t})n\_{t-1}+m\_{t} You inherit employment n\_{t-1} from the previous period, some matches dissolve based on rho\_t and you get new matches m\_t. This is similar to the law of motion for capital. Alternatively, you could shift the whole equation by 1 period: n\_{t+1} =(1-rho\_{t})n\_{t}+m\_{t} and use predetermined\_variables n Regarding the limited information assumption, you need to change the information set of t…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.dynare.org/t/lagged-expectations/19048)._
